It is the unvaccinated who are actually following 'the science'. The vaccinated are operating on blind faith.....

Lies have become truth and truths have become lies.  

Most of the people saying:  "I'm following the science", they don't even know what science is.  So to set the record straight for those who are ignorant, science is an investigative process, and it does not move at warp speed, it takes time.

Using the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine as one example, anyone with an internet connection and simple compehension skills can go to the US Government website for the U.S. National Library of Medicine and look up the estimated study completion date for Pfizer's trial.  You will plainly see that the date listed in May 2, 2023 more than a year and a half from now.

Here's the link for the fact checkers:  

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728

Long term safety requires long term data obviously, otherwise you're just guessing and/or hoping.  Imagine being at an NHL hockey game, games which require three twenty minute periods with a potential for overtime and a shoot out.  One would not leave a game after two periods with the Toronto Maple Leafs ahead 5-2 and declare that the Leafs had won the game.  Newspapers and sporting publications wouldn't update the standings until the game had actually been completed.  

But that is what some, including some in the medical community, are doing with these Covid-19 injections.  They're declaring the game over and the decision finalized before the trials have even been completed.  

Even when science is followed mistakes happen.  

Pfizer developed a drug in 1995 that was marketed under the name Bextra, it was approved as a "safe and effective" anti-inflammatory medication after five years of study in the year 2000.  It was on the market for five years from 2000-2005 during which time people taking it developed heart damage, some dying.  It stayed on the market though because science required thorough investigation before it could be determined whether Bextra was in fact the cause of these adverse events.  When it was proven that yes, it was Bextra causing heart damage and deaths, only then was Bextra withdrawn.  

It should be a concern to any critical thinker that medicine and science are being both weaponized and politicized.  Nobody should be gas lit for asking legitimate questions.  Over 80% of Canadians have subjected themselves, and in some cases their children, to potential and unknown risks because of over reaching bureaucratic mandates.  That is on top of the known short term risks of heart damage, severe allergic reactions, menstural irregularities, auto-immune reactions and a list far too long to include everything, all said to be rare.  

If you're going to follow science then you have to let it play out, to do otherwise is to put people's lives at risk.