Sunday, November 15, 2020

Don't be fooled - Christmas gathering will be canceled, the decision has already been made...

I said I wasn't going to be pulling punches anymore.  Well here goes. Canadians are undergoing what amounts to a Psychological Operation right now, or colloquially a "Psy-Op".   The decision that Christmas gathering will be outlawed by unconstitutional decrees has already been made, that is opinion and it is an opinion that I hold with firm conviction.  

We are being told that it is "entirely up to us" whether Christmas get togethers will happen or not, and the reason for that is simple.  A house divided cannot stand.  There are individuals and groups in Canada who want our Charter Rights and Freedoms restored, who are opposed to being ruled by undemocratic dictate.  

When the eventual and already determined action of banning Christmas gathering comes down, the government wants Canadians to blame their friends and neighbours.  "If those people had just been good I could have seen my family".  Every war needs an enemy, someone other than the government for people to vent their anger and frustration on.  In Germany it was Trade Unionists, Communists and Jews, now it's those who want the restoration of democratic governance.  

Lockdown measures have been proven completely ineffective at controlling viral spread.  They've been brought in all over the world, in some cases with draconian measures, and yet the casedemic continues. There are no success stories in controlling the so called pandemic, because if the state of emergency ended then we'd go back to normal and the long planned GREAT RESET would halt in its tracks.  

Stay strong, don't be gas lit....this isn't ending any time soon.   



Thursday, November 12, 2020

Pandemic??? Really??? All cause mortality in Ontario drops during first 6 months of Covid as per StatsCan -

This mostly benign virus is why people are having their lives destroyed by government overreach, why 10,000 more children are dying every single month due to starvation according to the UN.  Why the abused have been forced by unconstitional dictates to shelter in place with their abusers.  

Governments lie, we know this.  Media lies, we also know this.  But data doesn't lie, numbers are just numbers.  Here's the link for the data from a recognized and reputable source, Statistics Canada.  

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310078501&fbclid=IwAR3XPQPof5V5w9CuZAwb7qZNtHK_AaqILc1gxlvOVSJpiv4dI4CKwQKSl0k

I'm not going to pull my punches anymore, Canada is on a very slippery slope toward a facist style of governance not seen since Nazi Germany.  Government with big business backing (the same way Hitler was supported) conspiring to destroy the rights, freedoms and liberties that so many Canadians died to protect, something we just commerated on November 11th.  

Here are Ontario's monthy death statistics for the period February through to July 2019 inclusive as per StatsCan, this is death from all causes:

Feb - 8,815

Mar - 9,390

Apr - 8,835

May - 8,895

Jun - 8,240

Jul - 8,475

Total = 52,650

Here is the same monthly data for the corresponding months in 2020, the first six months of a suppposed deadly pandemic.

Feb - 8,780

Mar - 9,325

Apr - 10,270

May - 8,935

Jun - 7,350

Jul - 6,800

Total = 51,460 

Go to the source at StatsCan and check the numbers, verify my math.  

52,650 people died between February and July (inclusive) in 2019, when there wasn't a global pandemic caused by a supposedly deadly virus.  In the corresponding period for 2020, when we're told there's a deadly pathogen killing so many people that we have to take any and all measurse possible to try and stop it, the number is 51,460, that's 1,190 less deaths during a supposed pandemic.....

Why aren't more people dying this year?  Is it because we're doing a really good job of keeping the infection rate down?  Nope...hundreds and thousands of people are being infected every single day, that's been happening since late March of this year in Ontario.  And those are only the identified cases, ones confirmed by a very imperfect PCR test.  The real infection rate is actually higher.

Government is all in on lockdowns, they'll only listen to medical professionals who advocate strict draconian measures, dissenting voices don't get a seat at the table.   Government subsidized media outlets only push the government narrative, to say nothing of the large cororapte and industrial sector.  

Sound familiar?  Do you think Adolf Hitler robbed Germans of their constitutional rights and freedoms all on his own, with just the power of his charisma and oratory?  If you know your history you know the powers that backed Hitler in his rise to power, how wealthy industrialists were key players in elevating a failed street painter to the cusp of bringing the human race under one "all for the common good" governing apparatus.  

Don't think it can happen now?  Germans didn't believe it could happen back then either. Congratulations for thinking like them, your ignorance is needed for The Great Reset to go forward.  



Sunday, October 25, 2020

Large Danish trial could put an end to the masking debate...

A large randomized control trial could finally put an end to the whole masking debate.  Three Danish hospitals as well as the Technical University of Denmark have conducted what may very well be the largest ever clinical trial looking into the efficacy of community masking on reducing rates of viral infection.  It's certainly the largest such trial in the Covid era.

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04337541

6,000 participants were randomized into a masked and a control group, 3,000 participants in each.  All were tested and determined to be Covid free at the start of the trial.  The study was completed back on June 2nd, now we're simply waiting on the results to be published.  

Public health officials have had a dearth of information on which to base policy decisions.  Canada's own McMaster University conducted a review of over 100 years of research into masking and the most that they could conclude is that community masking might provide a small benefit, maybe.  As published in the Annals of Internal Medicine here is their conclusion.  

No direct evidence indicates that public mask wearing protects either the wearer or others. Given the severity of this pandemic and the difficulty of control, we suggest that the possible benefit of a modest reduction in transmission likely outweighs the possibility of harm

This Danish study could finally provide a large dose of definitive proof about the value of community masking mandates, after all Randomized Control Trials are considered the gold standard of science.  If the results show that the unmasked arm had a statistically significant higher rate of infection, then in my opinion we should be all in on community masking mandates and the anti-masking horde should suck it up and shut up.  

If the results show similar rates of infection in both arms, then we're basically status quo with evidence pointing to a possible small benefit.  In that case I would expect the anti-masking crowd to continue their complaining and protesting.

There is potential for controversy however if the results show that the masked arm experienced higher rates of SAR-Cov-2 infection than the unmasked arm in a statistically significant way.  Not only would this put winds in the sails of the anti-mask protesters, it could also serve further erode public confidence in public health officials.  

Science should never be controversial, it is what it is.  But sadly, with this pandemic the science has become increasingly political.  Educated people know that science is a process, it doesn't stop when a politically desired result is indicated.  

I know many people who think they're certified epidemiologists with their internet and youtube degrees.  And I don't doubt that if this study does in fact show that masking increases the risk of viral infection, that some dim bulbs will dismiss the results out of hand because it doesn't affirm their predetermined conclusions. Confirmation bias is rampant in today's world and everyone is guilty of it to one degree or another.

My bias leans toward community masking being ineffective and potentially increasing infection rates, but if this study shows a benefit to masking I will keep my ego in check and acknowledge what the highest level of science has to say.  

If you liked this post please share, the buttons are below. 



Wednesday, October 14, 2020

Leaked government pandemic plan? Terrifying if true...

Regular readers of this pathetic and miserable little blog, (yes all three of you) know that I like to keep it between the lines so to speak.  I like to stick with reliable and respected media, academic and government sources.  Of course the opinions expressed are my own, but the facts I use to support my views, I like them to be reputable.

What I'm about to share has none of those attributes, it is merely something I have come across on social media, and I know of no way to verify it's authenticity.  Ultimately I am a citizen blogger, not a journalsist, I don't have insiders feeding me informtion.  

This is a rabbit hole I really don't like going down because it is simply too scary.  We've all read novels portraying a dystopian future, be it Orwell's "1984" or Huxley's "Brave New World".  In fact I recently read a book by Cory Doctorow called "Radicalized" which is actually four novellas which all paint a dim future ahead.

This is a post off of facebook, the source for which claims to be a committee member with the Liberal Party of Canada.  The predictions being made are close, weeks and months away not years.  It is my most fervent prayer that this is simply an exercise in creative writing, which is something I myslef engaged in early in the pandemic with my 'A Not So Modest Proposal'  I presented that post as strictly fiction, what I'm going to share is not presented in that way at all.

If it's not true (thank God) then I view it as 'no harm no foul'.  If it is true, I don't see it being stopped.  

It is so Orwellian that I expect that even if it did come to pass, that people would support these supposed measures as being 'for the common good' because to believe otherwise is something a lot of people won't be able to confront.  I have no doubt that in Nazi Germany there were people who tried to warn others about what was coming, but the warnings were ignored because it was too diabolical to believe.  

It's long been said that people prefer a lie to harsh truth.  Hopefully what I'm not going to share is the thing that is not true.  

I want to provide you some very important information. I'm a committee member within the Liberal Party of Canada. I sit within several committee groups but the information I am providing is originating from the Strategic Planning committee (which is steered by the PMO).
>
> I need to start off by saying that I'm not happy doing this but I have to. As a Canadian and more importantly as a parent who wants a better future not only for my children but for other children as well. The other reason I am doing this is because roughly 30% of the committee members are not pleased with the direction this will take Canada, but our opinions have been ignored and they plan on moving forward toward their goals. They have also made it very clear that nothing will stop the planned outcomes.
>
> The road map and aim was set out by the PMO and is as follows:
>
> - Phase in secondary lock down restrictions on a rolling basis, starting with major metropolitan areas first and expanding outward. Expected by November 2020.
> - Rush the acquisition of (or construction of) isolation facilities across every province and territory. Expected by December 2020.
> - Daily new cases of COVID-19 will surge beyond capacity of testing, including increases in COVID related deaths following the same growth curves. Expected by end of November 2020.
> - Complete and total secondary lock down (much stricter than the first and second rolling phase restrictions). Expected by end of December 2020 - early January 2021
> - Reform and expansion of the unemployment program to be transitioned into the universal basic income program. Expected by Q1 2021.
> - Projected COVID-19 mutation and/or co-infection with secondary virus (referred to as COVID-21) leading to a third wave with much higher mortality rate and higher rate of infection. Expected by February 2021.
> - Daily new cases of COVID-21 hospitalizations and COVID-19 and COVID-21 related deaths will exceed medical care facilities capacity. Expected Q1 - Q2 2021.
> - Enhanced lock down restrictions (referred to as Third Lock Down) will be implemented. Full travel restrictions will be imposed (including inter-province and inter-city). Expected Q2 2021.
> - Transitioning of individuals into the universal basic income program. Expected mid Q2 2021.
> - Projected supply chain break downs, inventory shortages, large economic instability. Expected late Q2 2021.
> - Deployment of military personnel into major metropolitan areas as well as all major roadways to establish travel checkpoints. Restrict travel and movement. Provide logistical support to the area. Expected by Q3 2021.
>
>
>
> Along with that provided road map the Strategic Planning committee was asked to design an effective way of transitioning Canadians to meet a unprecedented economic endeavor. One that would change the face of Canada and forever alter the lives of Canadians. What we were told was that in order to offset what was essentially an economic collapse on a international scale, that the federal government was going to offer Canadians a total debt relief. This is how it works: the federal government will offer to eliminate all personal debts (mortgages, loans, credit cards, etc) which all funding will be provided
> to Canada by the IMF under what will become known as the World Debt Reset program. In exchange for acceptance of this total debt forgiveness the individual would forfeit ownership of any and all property and assets forever. The individual would also have to agree to partake in the COVID-19 and COVID-21 vaccination schedule, which would provide the individual with unrestricted travel and unrestricted living even under a full lock down (through the use of photo identification referred to as Canada's HealthPass) .
>
> Committee members asked who would become the owner of the forfeited property and assets in that scenario and what would happen to lenders or financial institutions, we were simply told "the World Debt Reset program will handle all of the details". Several committee members also questioned what would happen to individuals if they refused to participate in the World Debt Reset program, or the HealthPass, or the vaccination schedule, and the answer we got was very troubling. Essentially we were told it was our duty to make sure we came up with a plan to ensure that would never happen. We were told it was in the individuals best interest to participate. When several committee members pushed relentlessly to get an answer we were told that those who refused would first live under the lock down restrictions indefinitely. And that over a short period of time as more Canadians transitioned into the debt forgiveness program, the ones who refused to participate would be deemed a public safety risk and would be relocated into isolation facilities. Once in those facilities they would be given two options, participate in the debt forgiveness program and be released, or stay indefinitely in the isolation facility under the classification of a serious public health risk and have all their assets seized.
>
> So as you can imagine after hearing all of this it turned into quite the heated discussion and escalated beyond anything I've ever witnessed before. In the end it was implied by the PMO that the whole agenda will move forward no matter who agrees with it or not. That it wont just be Canada but in fact all nations will have similar roadmaps and agendas. That we need to take advantage of the situations before us to promote change on a grander scale for the betterment of everyone. The members who were opposed and ones who brought up key issues that would arise from such a thing were completely ignored. Our opinions and concerns were ignored. We were simply told to just do it.
>
>
> All I know is that I don't like it and I think its going to place Canadians into a dark future.