Wild Wing in Belleville - Quietly Doing The Right Thing

Friday night I read that Wild Wing in Belleville had lost its liquor liscense due to their failure to require dine-in patons to divulge their vaccination status.  That news changed my dinner plans.  Instead of firing up the BBQ for burgers I headed down the road about 30 minutes for a pick up order of the best wings I've had in ages, maybe ever.

But I'm not writing this as a restaraunt critic.

I'm writing again about my support for businesses that are standing up against these draconian and illegal rules.  My tolerance for the willfully blind who still think any of the insanity of the past 19+ months has anything to do with public health is completely spent.  

Liquor stores and the tobacco industry always deemed essential but health centres and fitness studios forced to close because it's all about health. Yeah right! Next you'll tell me that Jews were spreaders of disease like many Germans were propagandized into believing in the 1930s and 40s thanks to Nazi science.    

Sorry, grow a brain or go read something else.  

I'm actually suprised that google, (the platform this blog is on) hasn't shut me down for the writing I've done going back to April of 2020.  But then this miserable and pathetic little blog only gets read a few hundred times depending on the subject matter....that's "viral" for Canadian Soapbox these days.  

I spoke with the owner of the franchise, Jackie, and the stress and worry was evident in her eyes, this has not been easy on her.  Not that the mandarins enforcing this garbage will care.  They're just following orders, a common excuse used throughout history.  Those dining in are not asked to comply with the clown show masking joke either.  You know the rules about putting one on while standing and taking it off while sitting.  

Utter stupidity that most people just play along with.  

While waiting for my order I saw people come in with masks, watched them drop them below their chins while ordering, then pulling them back up afterwards.  It's theatre of the absurd that would be great fodder for a Monty Python skit.  But nobody gave them a hard time including myself, everyone was civil and polite, masked or not.  

You see enforcement and by-law types everywhere wearing their useless masks and touching the outside material all the time.  If the pointless face diapers did work then that would be completely verboten....they know it's all garbage too.  

In speaking to Jackie we talked a bit about our shared faith in Jesus Christ.  The same Jesus who said I am the way, THE TRUTH and the life.  

How any Bible believing Chrisitan can bow down to the obvious lies being foisted upon the population as "science" is, quite frankly, beyond me.  She's not particularily concerned about the loss of the liquor license, most of the restaraunt sales come from food, and as I said earlier, the wings were absolutely spectacular.  

She knows what is going on in Kingston with Jakk Tuesdays, a Pub Restaraunt I've written about twice before, so she knows what is coming.  The authorities don't give a rat's rosy rear end about health, this is all about compliance. And it is not ending any time soon, in fact I'm convinced it never ends.  Jackie though is not itching for a fight, she is nothing like Adam Skelly.  I can confidently assert that she would just like to be left alone to run her business, complying with genuine rules and regulations regarding health and safety.  

I'm going to implore any enforcement types, if there are any with a shred of integrity left, or if there are any who want to reclaim the integrity they've thrown away....just stop.  Stop harrassing honest businesses that never caused a single issue and go back to doing your jobs.  

And everyone else, if you're in and around the Belleville area show your support for Wild Wing and any other businesses with the courage to fight back.  

Here's the story as reported by CTV news, an orginization I typically view as little more than yellow journalsim, but in this case I think they struck a mostly reasonable tone.    

https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/owner-of-ontario-restaurant-that-lost-liquor-licence-for-not-checking-vaccine-status-says-she-isn-t-being-rebellious-1.5663747

Messenger RNA and children? Think long and hard because there's no "UN"injecting

It's already started in the United States, and Canada won't be far behind.  Five to eleven year olds in this country will soon be eligible to roll up their sleeves for a shot that will send instructions into their little bodies telling which proteins to recruit and how to build the infamous SARS-Cov-2 spike protein.  

These are the same shots that have caused hundreds of cases of heart damage, (myocarditis and pericarditis) across Canada, maybe even thousands.  In Ontario alone over 200 cases were identified up through this past September, with over half being in people under the age of 25  The numbers tilted particularily toward the younger male population, but not exclusively.  

There are many risks that come with these shots, all said to be very rare.  Beyond the scary prospect of damaging the heart there are several others including severe allergic reactions and conditions like Bell's Palsy.  When the shots first started rolling out there was nothing said about any risks of heart damage, that only came to light after people started rolling up their sleeves.

I should note that I consider the authorization for injecting young children to be a done deal.  While Dr. Tam was recently quoted as saying a decision is imminent, (weeks not months) as to whether or not an approval is given, in my opinion the decision has already been made.  The delay is simply to give the impression of careful deliberation.  I will eat my cowboy hat if they're not authorized for kiddies.

At the end of the day many will do a risk reward calculation. The innoculations are said to provide some protection against infection, and in the cases of breakthrough infections the shots are said to lessen the severity of disease.  Heretofore those under twelve have not been eligible and it remains to be seen if other risk factors will be identifed once massive dosing starts in young kids.

So far in Canada there have been 17 deaths reported in those nineteen and under dying "with" covid.  I stress the word "with" because every report I have seen about younger people dying has reported the victims as suffering from serious underlying health conditions.  The youngest death recorded was said to be an infant in BC, and that covid was "a" factor....but no details were given on the other condition or conditions that played a role for some reason.  It seems medical information is only private now when it doesn't involve Covid for some reason.  

In Alberta the youngest death was for a time attributed to a 14 year old.  But Dr. Deena Hinshaw was forced to apologize after it was revealed that the cause of death was stage four inoperable brain cancer and not covid.  The fact that a child receiving end of life palliative care was subjected to a PCR test two days before passing is beyond criminal.  And it speaks to the fact that Covid has long ceased to be just a health issue, it has now been thoroughly politicized and that is disgusting.  If it wasn't for the young man's sisters going public I have zero doubt they'd still be calling it a covid death.  

Bottom line, parents of younger healthy children need to think long and hard about this decision.  

And they need to consult with all opinions, including those of Doctors who have been silenced and censored.  One specific example I will give is Dr. Francis Christian, a teaching surgeon and the editor of a medical journal in Saskatchewan.  At least he was until his liscence was suspended for daring to suggest that the risks to younger healthy people might just be greater from the injections than from Covid itself.  There are over 200 people in Ontario, at least some of whom might have appreciated if this eminently qualified Doctor had been given a proper platform to express his expert medical opinion.

And if ultimately you do decide to decline the shots and are asked about it, try to refrain from saying:  "I did my research" or anything else which causes the brainless unthinking mob to fit you for a tinfoil hat.  Instead simply say you've sought out expert medical advice....not this blog or any other internet based information.  

Check out:

• Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former VP at Pfizer and one of their Chief Science Officers.
• Dr. Robert Malone, Harvard educated and cited by Google as an Inventor of mRNA vaccines
• Dr. Luc Montagnier, a Nobel Prize winner for isolating HIV the virus that causes AIDS.
• Dr. Byram Bridle, chosen by the Ontario government to investigate 4 vaccines under development in May of 2020 due to his reputation as one of Canada's leading vaccinology experts.
• Dr. Francis Christian as already mentioned in this post.
• Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche who's held senior roles in vaccine development with Pharma Giants GSK and Novartis and leading positions with GAVI and the Gates foundation. 

I could go on forever, there are quite literally hundreds and probably thousands.  Many have videos out on sites like Rumble and Bitchute to combat the censorship and deplatforming they're all being subject to.  

It's no different from the experts who said Iraq did not have Weapons of Mass Destruction....those experts were right but they weren't allowed to speak to a large audience because there was a political agenda at work that had nothing to do with global peace and security. 

Sidney Crosby and Aaron Rodgers - A tale of two failed immunizations

Two athletes, both superstars in their respective sports, have been identified as having Covid-19.  Sidney Crosby of the NHL's Pittsburgh Penguins and Aaron Rodgers of the NFL's Green Bay Packers have both tested positive.  Both are considered sure fire hall of famers, they're close in age with Crosby 34 and Rodgers 37.  

A key difference between the two however, in terms of Covid, is how they chose to be immunized.  Crosby opted for the more accepted method of getting injected with the Covid-19 vaccines.  Rodgers on the other hand chose a number of medications, including controversial ivermectin.  No doubt it was the human formulation, not the one given to animals like horses for de-worming.  

Rodgers has been criticized and even villified by some and accused of lying because he had claimed to be immunized.  Obviously he wasn't.  An immunization by definition refers to something that confers immunity to an individual. 

A simple on-line search for the definition of immunization provides this:  "The action of making a person or animal immune to infection, typically by inoculation". 

Obviously Crosby and Rodgers were not immunized.  

If they were neither would have tested positive for the very thing they were immunized against.  Thankfully both have been reported to have had very mild cases.  So in terms of efficacy, it would seem Rodger's treatment was every bit as effective as Crosby's injections.  

Rodgers is on record as saying that he is allergic to the ingredients in the mRNA shots, and that he wasn't willing ot take the risks associated with the J&J shot.  Obviously anyone, whether allergic or not to the ingredients, is taking on some risk by getting the Covid-19 injections.  There are well documented risks of heart inflammation (mycarditis and periocarditis), blood clots, bell's palsy, severe allergic reactions and several more.  

The risks are said to be small, but that is little comfort to those suffering.  A report published by Ontario Public Heath had the number of people suffering heart damage up to September 4th 2021 at 106 just in the under 25 age bracket.  It was reported that there were almost that many in people over 25 as well, with the statistics tilting heavily towards males.  

https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/documents/ncov/epi/covid-19-myocarditis-pericarditis-vaccines-epi.pdf?sc_lang=en

There can be little doubt that those numbers have gone up in the past two months.  Those who've opted to accept the risks, and who have thus far avoided any severe adverse events, they will likely be more prone to vilifying Aaron Rodgers while supporting Sid The Kid.  

But ultimately both athelets had the same outcome, regardless of making different choices.  Sadly our world is becoming less and less Pro-Choice.  

It is the unvaccinated who are actually following 'the science'. The vaccinated are operating on blind faith.....

Lies have become truth and truths have become lies.  

Most of the people saying:  "I'm following the science", they don't even know what science is.  So to set the record straight for those who are ignorant, science is an investigative process, and it does not move at warp speed, it takes time.

Using the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine as one example, anyone with an internet connection and simple compehension skills can go to the US Government website for the U.S. National Library of Medicine and look up the estimated study completion date for Pfizer's trial.  You will plainly see that the date listed in May 2, 2023 more than a year and a half from now.

Here's the link for the fact checkers:  

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728

Long term safety requires long term data obviously, otherwise you're just guessing and/or hoping.  Imagine being at an NHL hockey game, games which require three twenty minute periods with a potential for overtime and a shoot out.  One would not leave a game after two periods with the Toronto Maple Leafs ahead 5-2 and declare that the Leafs had won the game.  Newspapers and sporting publications wouldn't update the standings until the game had actually been completed.  

But that is what some, including some in the medical community, are doing with these Covid-19 injections.  They're declaring the game over and the decision finalized before the trials have even been completed.  

Even when science is followed mistakes happen.  

Pfizer developed a drug in 1995 that was marketed under the name Bextra, it was approved as a "safe and effective" anti-inflammatory medication after five years of study in the year 2000.  It was on the market for five years from 2000-2005 during which time people taking it developed heart damage, some dying.  It stayed on the market though because science required thorough investigation before it could be determined whether Bextra was in fact the cause of these adverse events.  When it was proven that yes, it was Bextra causing heart damage and deaths, only then was Bextra withdrawn.  

It should be a concern to any critical thinker that medicine and science are being both weaponized and politicized.  Nobody should be gas lit for asking legitimate questions.  Over 80% of Canadians have subjected themselves, and in some cases their children, to potential and unknown risks because of over reaching bureaucratic mandates.  That is on top of the known short term risks of heart damage, severe allergic reactions, menstural irregularities, auto-immune reactions and a list far too long to include everything, all said to be rare.  

If you're going to follow science then you have to let it play out, to do otherwise is to put people's lives at risk.