Stephen Harper Video - Why he won't debate Iggy

Conservative leader Stephen Harper has finally spoken up about why he doesn't want to go toe-to-toe with Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff.

 

 

Click the button below to vote for Canadian Soapbox at CanadianBlogosphere, then click green.

  (You can vote once every day)

C'mon Harper, don't wimp out. Debate Ignatieff!!!

Ouch!!!  This is gonna leave a mark.

Stephen Harper challenges Michael Ignatieff to a debate, one on one, mano-a-mano.  Ignatieff gets his gloves on and says: "Anyplace, anytime...let's go"!!!  Then Stephen runs and hides. 

This would be great drama, the new kid and the bully. Well, it would be if the Conservative leader had any cajones.  Rick Mercer is even offering to book a venue and moderate on twitter.  

Now Stephen has his media toadies making excuses for him in the press, like George W. Bush speech writer David Frum in the National Post (Column Here).  Or Shelly Fralic in the Vancouver Sun saying such a debate would be meaningless (Column Here).

Nobody likes a bully.  But even worse is a bully who kicks sand then runs and hides, leaving his friends to make lame excuses. 

No wonder Canada lost its place on the U.N. security council. I mean seriously, why give a seat to a country led by by a wimp?

Click the button below to vote for Canadian Soapbox at CanadianBlogosphere, then click green.

  (You can vote once every day)

Why does Stephen Harper surround himself with sleaze?

Love him or loathe him, Stephen Harper doesn't come across as a sleazy character, far from it.  Sure he's made a boat load of promises and commitments that he's later broken or completely ignored, but that's par for the course in the political arena.  Trudeau, Mulroney, Chretien and Stephen Harper would all qualify for lifetime memberships in The Liars Club.  But sleaze is probably not an adjective you would apply to Canada's Prime Minister pro-tem.     

He's a fundamentalist Christian who belongs to the Christian and Missionary Alliance Church for goodness sake.  Harper comes across as very straight laced, irrespective of him singing about 'getting high with a little help from his friends'.  I'm certain he looked upon that lyric as a spiritual high, nothing to do with smoking wacky tabacky.

So why do sleazy and thoroughly disreputable people keep popping up around him?

Bruce Carson was one of Harper's closest advisors.  (STORY HERE)  Why would Canada's Prime Minister want advice from a lawyer disbarred for stealing money from his clients?  Doesn't anyone look into this stuff?  Harper is famous for being a micro-managing control freak, surly he knew about this guy's history, unless he's incompetent. 

Now there's trouble brewing with Montreal area "star" candidate, Agop Evereklian.  The Conservative nominee was found guilty of writing bad cheques and was ordered by the courts to re-pay $30,000 to a former business partner.  (STORY HERE)

There's so much stuff out there about the Harper Regime's sleaze ball tactics and utter disdain for democracy that reading it all becomes almost too much, even for a political blogger.  Altering documents, defrauding taxpayers by ignoring election financing rules, refusing to cede to Parliamentary requests for costs of proposed initiatives like billion dollar U.S. style prisons.

I think I might have the answer to why Harper is surrounded by so much sleaze though. 

Stephen regards himself as more of an American style presidential candidate than as the leader of a Canadian federal party.  No more traditional Canadian scrums, just tightly controlled press conferences a la George Dubya Bush.   Voters are not being asked to vote for the Conservatives, instead its the Harper government, Canada's dear leader.  All Stephen Harper, all the time. 

So his candidates and advisors and other associated toadies are irrelevant.  Stephen could hire Bernie Madoff as an economic guru, who cares?  Jim Flaherty's economic forecasts are only good for a week or so anyway, but so what?

With an ego like Harper's I imagine he might have difficulty attracting decent talent anyway.  What respectable and intelligent person wants to work with an egomaniac and control freak?

Maybe the only people willing to put up with Harper are those whose past indiscretions leave them with precious few options.

Click the button below to vote for Canadian Soapbox at CanadianBlogosphere, then click green.

  (You can vote once every day)

Why do guys like Gaddafi and Harper fear coalitions

There are two men on this planet who seem joined at some level of consciousness, and it all centres on coalitions.  Both Stephen Harper and Muammar Gaddafir hate them. 

But why?

Coalition by definition means an alliance of distinct parties, persons or states for joint action.  Hrrrrrm, sounds an awful lot like cooperation to me, no wonder Harper hates the concept as much as Gaddafi.  In fact I wouldn't be surprised if Harper would prefer to lead Canada in the same fashion as Libya has been ruled.

Democracy is okay, it sounds good...but not if it means Stephen has to play nice and live up to the ideals he campaigns on, being a dictator seems much more his style.  His kindred spirit in North Africa is having some success in beating back the forces that oppose him.  But I'm one blogger who is hoping that both coalitions prevail.

Click the button below to vote for Canadian Soapbox at CanadianBlogosphere, then click green.

  (You can vote once every day)