At the end of the day pretty much everyone believes in conspiracies. In point of fact just about everyone has been involved with a conspiracy in one way or another. Conspiracy at its core simply means to plot, with the goal being deception. Anyone who has been involved in organizing a surprise party has conspired: "We need to stop in at your brother's place, I need you to pick up a letter from him". A simple lie to decieve someone so that they're unsuspecting when they walk in the door and everyone yells "SURPRISE"!!!
Criminal conspiracy of course is not as benign, when it's criminal it means two or more people plotting to engage in an activity that is illegal. Criminal conspiracy is one of the most commonly laid charges in the legal system. Watergate is a known and proven conspiracy, so was the murder of President Abraham Lincoln and the attempted murders of Vice President Andrew Johnson, and Secretary of State Seward. Many think John Wilkes Booth was acting alone, but it was a much bigger plan with many different players, all taking part in a conspiracy that was designed to revive the Confederacy.
When John F. Kennedy was assissinated the official version, put out by the Warren Commission, was that Lee Harvery Oswald had acted alone. After the Zapruder film became publicly available many people became conspiracy theorists for the first time, because the official account of a lone gunman simply did not stand up to scrutiny.
The bottom line is that conspiracies are real, they do take place.
The Gulf of Tonkin Incident, the George HW Bush Administration engaging a PR agency to concoct a story about Iraq's soldiers tossing babies out of incubators to build support for war, there are far too many examples. Many look at the near perfect implosion of Building Seven in the World Trade Complex and can't believe the official account that fire caused a steel framed building to collapse in on itself in a text book "contolled demolition" fashion.
Of course every conspriacy must have a reason. When it's something benign like a birthday party the goal is simply to surprise the celebrant and bring them some joy. With the Watergate break in though, the aim was far more sinsister, the goal was to subvert American democracy. Those who don't buy the laughable account of Lee Harvey Oswald acting alone point to JFK's reluctance to fully commit to war in Vietnam.
So if Covid is really a conspiracy, then what is the ultimate goal. A commonly punted belief is that the goal is depopulation There are certainly solid reasons for believing that some might see eliminating a significant percentage of the human race from this planet as not just a good thing, but a moral imperative. Do just a little bit of research from reputable academic and scientific sources and you'll find a plethora of articles and papers saying that this planet can only sustain a human population of two billion or so over the long term.
The current world's population is over 7.9 billion. In 2021 so far (10+ months) we've added over 65 million people (net gain of births minus deaths) which is a country the size of France. How is it that we can have nearly 8 billion people on a planet that can only support a quarter of that number over the long term?
According to "the science" it's because the Earth has (or rather had) substantial reserves built up, reserves which have now been severely depleted. There are computer modeled simulations projecting that unless something is done, and fast (within the next 5 to 10 years) that we'll start running out of such vital resources as clean water.
One of the biggest flies in the ointment for those who can at least wrap their heads around the possibility of a depopulation agenda is the question of: "Why now"? I was born in 1966, when the world's human population was said to be about 3.4 billion. less than half what it is now. So why wasn't something done sooner to avoid us reaching the point we're at? Some studies suggest as much as a quarter of the world's aereable land can no longer produce food due to soil degredation from over farming.
The reason I would contend that it hasn't been attempted on a grand scale before is because it simply wans't feasible. Sure we've had wars and genocides, but nothing involving billions. The first world war is said to have killed about 40 million people, 75 million are estimated to have been killed in the second global conflict. Stalin is believed to have killed 20 million Russians or more, Mao is creddited with the murder of as many as 45 million of his countrymen. That's 180 million people right there. If they hadn't been elimated how many more people would there be on the planet right now?
And while we're looking at things in a clear and rationale manner it's worth considering that global domination and eugenics has been attempted on a global scale once before, during the Nazi era. Hitler and the puppet masters pulling his strings had far reaching goals. Adolf Hitler was simply the front man for an agenda (eugenics) that had long taken root all over the world going back to the late 19th centrury.
And it wasn't just in Germany. Men like Henry Ford and Prescott Bush (father and grandfather to US Presidents George HW and George W respectively) were backers of the Nazis as were many royals around the globe. Hitler had the backing of major corporate interests and the aristocracy, not just in Germany but around the globe. But the Nazi plan was defeated, thankfully, and this diabolocal plan was put on the shelf for the past 75+ years.
I would submit that to carry out such a plan of global domination and population control, that such a plan would require super human intelligence. Back in the Nazi era of course super human intelligence did not exist. Now though, it does in the form of Artificial Intelligence or AI. We now have cars that can drive themselves, and computer programs that can actually learn and apply new data at lightening fast speeds.
We now have government agencies contemplating a convergence of the biological and digital....we've moved way past what was envisioned when I was in public school watching Steve Austin and "The Six Million Dollar Man". The government of Canada has published a vision of the future on a government website called "Policy Horizons Canada". You're welcome to take a look:
https://horizons.gc.ca/en/2020/02/11/exploring-biodigital-convergence/
You'll see the painting of a Utopia, a Brave New World. There's just one problem with this future, there are too many people on the planet right now for it to work. If the earth only produces enough renewable resources like raw materials, food, energy and water, for 1.9 billion people (according to a study done by the University of Texas) then how do we get below that number so that the planet can build back up the massive reserves it once had?
Most people know about the mysterious Georgia Guidestones, a Stone Henge type monument that suddenly appeared in 1980 on farmland about two hours east of Atlanta. Nobody knows who financed their construction or what their purpose is. But their ten guiding principles to a new and enlightened age have as their number one commandment a directive to maintain human population under 500 million in balance with nature.
Reducing human population to 500 million would require the elimination of over 7 billion people from this planet. How could something so monumental be achieved? Nazi Germany embarked on a plan centred on world domination and eugenics, but the architects of that plan saw it all fall horribly apart.
Have advances in medical science now made it achievable?
What if something could be introduced into the world that would weaken the human immune system? Back in the early 80s such a virus did suddenly appear, HIV which led to AIDS, short for "Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome". The HIV virus contained a toxic spike protein on its surface and the resulting disease saw countless people dying because their immune systems couldn't fight off normal pathogens....a simple RSV could be deadly.
Here's an article on the structural similarity between the spike on the HIV virus and the spike on the SarS-Cov-2 virus:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141560/
But given that millions of people have both gotten and fully recovered from Covid, it doesn't appear to be having any long lasting impact on the human immune system, save for a very small percentage of so called "long haul" symptoms that linger as they do with many respiratory viruses such as more commonly known influenza strains. If you didn't know that some flu patients suffer from "long haul" effects, here's an article on that.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-17497-6
Now of course there's a new way that this toxic spike protein is being introduced, and that is via these novel injections using mRNA and vector platforms for the first time in human history after around 20 years of study.
Heretofore vaccines typically introduced a deactivated (dead) virus into a person's body in order to elicit an immune response. Now though, and again for the first time, we're using vaccines that are narrowly focused on one simple component of a virus, the infamous toxic spike protein. The mRNA shots tell a person's body which proteins to recruit and how to build it, the Vector shots have the actual spike itself vectored onto another virus....the AstraZeneca shot uses a deactivated chimpanzee adenovirus.
Some might think such a diaboloical plan could never come to pass without eminently qualified experts speaking out. But then, there have been eminently qualified experts speaking out, and they have all been summarily and mercilessly slandered, maligned and censored.
Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former Chief Science Officer at Pfizer and one of that company's Vice Presidents. Dr. Luc Montagnier who won a Nobel Prize for discovering and isolating HIV. Dr. Robert Malone, who is creditted with a key discovery that led to the invention of mRNA and DNA vaccines while he was working at the prestigious Salk Institute, Dr. Geert Vanden Bosshe who held senior roles in vaccine development with Pharma Giants GSK and Novartis, and held leading roles with both GAVI and The Gates Foundation in their vaccine programs.
There are quite literally hundreds and probably thousands of incredibly qualified individuals with all the expertise needed to express an opinion issuing warnings....but you'll never see them interviewed on CNN.
If these shots do result in a weakening of the human immune system, then we could be seeing a steady stream of sick and dying people in the coming years. But it wouldn't happen at all once. Freddy Mercury was diagnosed with AIDS in 1987, and he didn't die until 1991. Of course Freddie had access to superior medical care due to his wealth, without it he probably would have died much sooner. It could be that our chronically underfunded and overwhelmed health care system, already near collapse with the baby boomers now in their senior years.....countries like Canada might see their hospitals turned into war zones.
There is an old Chinese curse which says: "May you live in interesting times". It seems a fitting way for me to end this post given that many of the world's leading experts now believe that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was a result of gain of function research conducted in Wuhan China with some of the funding provided by Anthony Fauci's NIH.
As for the super intelligent AI that would be needed to orchestrate such a plan and coordinate all the intricate and almost endless variables to manipulate the populations response. Here's a video with Elon Musk, a major proponent of AI and his thoughts on the Pandora's Box he helped open up.
No comments:
Post a Comment